<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem with the Idea of &#8220;Personal Blogging&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 22:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Harajli</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Casey Harajli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, nice day.. Your post is very uplifting. I never considered that it was possible to carry out something like that until after I looked over your write-up. You certainly offered an incredible perception on how this kind of whole system functions. I will make sure to come back for more info. Keep it up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, nice day.. Your post is very uplifting. I never considered that it was possible to carry out something like that until after I looked over your write-up. You certainly offered an incredible perception on how this kind of whole system functions. I will make sure to come back for more info. Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By and large, I&#039;m trying for the latter. There&#039;s plenty of fluff between the better stuff.

I&#039;ve never really been comfortable calling my website a &quot;blog&quot; anyway. I used to spell it &quot;blahg.&quot;

It&#039;s a goofy word with a hundred meanings.

You&#039;re right, I think. It&#039;s just people with websites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By and large, I&#8217;m trying for the latter. There&#8217;s plenty of fluff between the better stuff.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never really been comfortable calling my website a &#8220;blog&#8221; anyway. I used to spell it &#8220;blahg.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a goofy word with a hundred meanings.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I think. It&#8217;s just people with websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaycruz</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaycruz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the interview Arianna Hufftinton had with Charlie Rose she at least didn&#039;t come out looking like a fool. I mean, she had more than 6 minutes, like 30 minutes to make the case for blogging and Rose wasn&#039;t like Stewart pressuring and asking her to point the difference between &quot;blogging&quot; from writing. Journalism is journalism, opinion is opinion, and commentary is commentary. I guess my biggest beef like I mentioned is selling &quot;blogging&quot; as personal and intimate journalism, when it&#039;s really just people with web sites.  Sometimes people express their opinions, sometimes their just chatty, and sometimes there are people that actually write great stuff. I think we need more of the last one.

*This comment was edited to add that last sentence. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interview Arianna Hufftinton had with Charlie Rose she at least didn&#8217;t come out looking like a fool. I mean, she had more than 6 minutes, like 30 minutes to make the case for blogging and Rose wasn&#8217;t like Stewart pressuring and asking her to point the difference between &#8220;blogging&#8221; from writing. Journalism is journalism, opinion is opinion, and commentary is commentary. I guess my biggest beef like I mentioned is selling &#8220;blogging&#8221; as personal and intimate journalism, when it&#8217;s really just people with web sites.  Sometimes people express their opinions, sometimes their just chatty, and sometimes there are people that actually write great stuff. I think we need more of the last one.</p>
<p>*This comment was edited to add that last sentence. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My lack of archives belies the fact that my time writing on the web pre-dates the word &quot;blog.&quot; When I started people had online journals, portfolio sites, and sites that linked to other sites (like a personal Digg or Reddit).

Many of the online journals and portfolio sites developed a &quot;News&quot; page or section that was periodically updated. The &quot;News&quot; page talked about recent changes and additions to the websites, and things happening in the life of the website&#039;s owner. The owner even linked to other things the s/he thought was nifty.

The &quot;News&quot; section became more and more prominent until, for many people, it essential *became* the site. These became Web Logs WebLogs bLogs Blogs.

I was writing before there was an internet. I&#039;m one of those dreamers who wanted to write a novel, or have an essay or two published in a magazine somewhere. I was a member of a writing group. We met on Thursday&#039;s once or twice a month. We&#039;d read our stuff to each other. Critique. Talk about writing. Occasionally bragged about being published in a small magazine or the local rag.

And then the internet exploded --

I got my own site that was going to be a portfolio site for my writing. But the &quot;News&quot; section became the important section. Suddenly I had an audience reading what I wrote. The more I wrote the more people came. I became a better and better writer. I was finding my voice and being comfortable with it.

I had a weblog. And, I&#039;m sorry Ms. Huffington, I almost never publish my first draft.

Maybe I don&#039;t have a weblog.

(Sorry, Jay, for co-opting your website. I return you back to your regularly scheduled programming ...)

(ps This was a first draft.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lack of archives belies the fact that my time writing on the web pre-dates the word &#8220;blog.&#8221; When I started people had online journals, portfolio sites, and sites that linked to other sites (like a personal Digg or Reddit).</p>
<p>Many of the online journals and portfolio sites developed a &#8220;News&#8221; page or section that was periodically updated. The &#8220;News&#8221; page talked about recent changes and additions to the websites, and things happening in the life of the website&#8217;s owner. The owner even linked to other things the s/he thought was nifty.</p>
<p>The &#8220;News&#8221; section became more and more prominent until, for many people, it essential *became* the site. These became Web Logs WebLogs bLogs Blogs.</p>
<p>I was writing before there was an internet. I&#8217;m one of those dreamers who wanted to write a novel, or have an essay or two published in a magazine somewhere. I was a member of a writing group. We met on Thursday&#8217;s once or twice a month. We&#8217;d read our stuff to each other. Critique. Talk about writing. Occasionally bragged about being published in a small magazine or the local rag.</p>
<p>And then the internet exploded &#8211;</p>
<p>I got my own site that was going to be a portfolio site for my writing. But the &#8220;News&#8221; section became the important section. Suddenly I had an audience reading what I wrote. The more I wrote the more people came. I became a better and better writer. I was finding my voice and being comfortable with it.</p>
<p>I had a weblog. And, I&#8217;m sorry Ms. Huffington, I almost never publish my first draft.</p>
<p>Maybe I don&#8217;t have a weblog.</p>
<p>(Sorry, Jay, for co-opting your website. I return you back to your regularly scheduled programming &#8230;)</p>
<p>(ps This was a first draft.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Sackrider, II</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale Sackrider, II]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogging is keeping a weB LOG... logging your thoughts even if its a brain dump has value for the blogger even if you as a blog reader do not care for it.  Some blogs are more like newspaper columns where they are thought out like you prefer, others are just starting points to kick off conversation from blog readers, kind of like a forum* or an email.  I wouldn&#039;t expect an email or a forum post to be as well thought out as I would a newspaper column.

*The difference between a blog and a forum however is like the difference between a talk radio host taking calls about a particular subject verses open lines where users pick the subject matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging is keeping a weB LOG&#8230; logging your thoughts even if its a brain dump has value for the blogger even if you as a blog reader do not care for it.  Some blogs are more like newspaper columns where they are thought out like you prefer, others are just starting points to kick off conversation from blog readers, kind of like a forum* or an email.  I wouldn&#8217;t expect an email or a forum post to be as well thought out as I would a newspaper column.</p>
<p>*The difference between a blog and a forum however is like the difference between a talk radio host taking calls about a particular subject verses open lines where users pick the subject matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buzz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Problem with the Idea of “Personal Blogging”</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Buzz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Problem with the Idea of “Personal Blogging”]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] How many people haven’t blogged about the fact that you compared Keith Olberman to Sean Hannity . Stewart: What? How many people blogged about it? I don’t know? Hufftington: On the Hufftington Post many people blogged about asking, &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How many people haven’t blogged about the fact that you compared Keith Olberman to Sean Hannity . Stewart: What? How many people blogged about it? I don’t know? Hufftington: On the Hufftington Post many people blogged about asking, &#8230;[Continue Reading] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaycruz</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jaycruz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m the wrong person you should be asking -I&#039;m basically a &quot;manchild&quot; :) and I don&#039;t have kids- but I think it&#039;s definitely more on the side of focused and relevant. I think blogs like yours and Dooce offer a lot of value to people, specially when they are well written.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the wrong person you should be asking -I&#8217;m basically a &#8220;manchild&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and I don&#8217;t have kids- but I think it&#8217;s definitely more on the side of focused and relevant. I think blogs like yours and Dooce offer a lot of value to people, specially when they are well written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sailor Scott</title>
		<link>http://tapenoisediary.com/2008/12/04/the-problem-with-the-idea-of-personal-blogging/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sailor Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapenoisediary.wordpress.com/?p=650#comment-255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting take on the writing process.  I couldn&#039;t survive the entire video and got more instead out of your cliff noted version.  But to cut to the point, I would be interested to know if YOU think my writing falls on the grassy side of the fence where the content is focused and relevant or on the delapidated and withering side of personal opinions and &#039;dreck.&#039;  Perhaps I am in need of some fertilizer.  Or maybe not.  Awaiting your response...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting take on the writing process.  I couldn&#8217;t survive the entire video and got more instead out of your cliff noted version.  But to cut to the point, I would be interested to know if YOU think my writing falls on the grassy side of the fence where the content is focused and relevant or on the delapidated and withering side of personal opinions and &#8216;dreck.&#8217;  Perhaps I am in need of some fertilizer.  Or maybe not.  Awaiting your response&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

