Posted in September 2009

The Blurred Line Between Packrating and Hoarding

Magazines

See those magazines? No, it’s not a dentist’s waiting room. Those are mine and they’re just the ones on a coffee table in my living room. Yes, there’s more. But these I’m going to read. That’s what I’ve been telling myself. I keep them neatly stacked and spread them out just for effect. In one of my bookshelves, I have stacked magazines. I end up reading most of them. Some of them are 6 month trial subscriptions, but others like Wired I read religiously and re-subscribe every year. I don’t have a problem committing to reading them, but I keep them. I like to think that I “collect” them, but I’m not planning on opening a gallery soon.

I bring up the magazine issue because I’ve been watching the show called Hoarder’s on A&E. This show scares the living crap out of me. It scares me because I can relate. While the people in the show have really serious problems, I cannot say with a straight face that something like that won’t ever happen to me. And I know the show is presented in an über-sensationalistic manner that will get you searching on Google collecting vs hoarding, but the problem is very serious and very real.

Some of the people in the show are clearly demented. People with trash, expired food in a fridge, fecal matter on floors; they crossed the line of denial to let things get like that. But others that are at least aware that they have a problem, are the ones that I find more striking. I find them striking because their problem at its core level, is the same one I have with the magazines and what everyone has in general with clutter. “I’ll read it later”. “I’ll use this in the future”. Basically a miscalculation on the future use of things. And as many neurologists and psychologists know, were pretty awful at predicting the future.

I’m in no way an expert on the condition and have no idea exactly what separates the pack-rat-clutterer from the full blown hoarder. Its Wikipedia entry states in the characteristics section that, “there is no definition of compulsive hoarding in accepted diagnostic criteria (such as the current DSM), Frost and Hartl (1996) and it’s related with OCD and schizophrenia. I’m taking this as meaning that a hoarder could either be mentally healthy or not. There’s an in depth discussion in this Metafilter thread about some of these issues.

But what I do know is that modern society has taught us very well how to acquire stuff, but it never taught us how to get rid of stuff. A lot of us are not close to getting a letter by the government declaring our conditions hazardous, but that shouldn’t stop us from asking ourselves every now and then why are we keeping something.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

The Gangs of Rio

The Gangs of Rio

John Lee Anderson writes in the New Yorker about the gangs in the “favelas” of Rio de Janeiro. The above link takes you to an audio-slide with striking photos of the gang controlled neighborhoods. The modern City of God.

Tagged , , , ,

The Length of Albums

Why Are some CD’s longer than Others?

Tyler Cowen of Marginal Revolution offers some thoughts in response to a reader about the different lengths of albums across different genres like rap, metal, prog, and jazz. The simple and immediate answer is that the length has a lot to do with the written or unwritten formulas of a particular music genre. But Cowen pointed out that it also has a lot to do on how varied the audience is:

If you wanted a somewhat strained explanation, you could argue that the longer CD is a more bundled product and it will make economic sense as a form of price discrimination, the more varied the valuations of the audience.  This would require that rap CD buyers have a higher variance of marginal valuation.

That makes total sense because the hip-hop and rap audience is probably the most varied out there right now.

Tagged , , , ,

The Formula for Happiness

The Formula for Happiness

It’s supposedly simple: Happiness = P + (5xE) + (3xH). P stands for Personal Characteristics, E stands for Existence, and H represents Higher Order needs.

Life coach Pete Cohen, who co-wrote the study, admitted that the equation was not easy for most people to understand.

So there you go.

via HN

Tagged ,

Food For Thought Links

food-for-thoughtQuestioning Accidentalism

Nicholas Carr refutes the idea that progress in media technology is “accidental”.

When you describe an event or a thing as an accident, what you are doing is draining it of all human content. You are saying that human intention and will and desire played no part in its occurrence. A volcano is an accident in human history (if not natural history), and if it’s a big enough one it may well influence the course of that history. But the the book, the printing press, the publishing house, the newspaper, and the newspaper company are not volcanoes. Their development was guided not just by blind circumstance but by human intent and desire. They represent, not just in the abstract but in their concrete forms, something that people wanted and that people consciously brought into being, for human purposes.

Why Are Russians So Good at Chess?

Because they are obsessed with it at a nationalistic level. From the Slate article:

Chess has long been popular in Russia—Czar Ivan IV is thought to have died while playing a match in 1584. After the Bolsheviks took power in 1917, it became a national pastime. Soon after the revolution, Vladimir Lenin’s supreme commander of the Soviet army, Nikolay Krylenko, laid the foundations for state-sponsored chess: He opened chess schools, hosted tournaments, and promoted the game as a vehicle for international dominance. The first state-sponsored chess tournament was held in Moscow in 1921. Six years later, chess prodigy Alexander Alekhine became the first Russian to win a world tournament. By 1934, 500,000 amateur players had registered with the state chess program. When Mikhail Botvinnik won the international title in 1948, he kicked off an era of Soviet domination that extended unbroken—except for a four-year streak by American Bobby Fischer—until the fall of the USSR.

So Who Are the True Elitists?

The author of the article literary claims:

Given two people with comparable levels of intelligence and technical skills, the one with less-reputable external marks of status will be more likely to display outward signs of elitism, arrogance, and snobbery.

via HN

Tagged , , , , ,

From The Archives

Following Simen of DailyMeh’s suggestion, I went through my archives to highlight some posts from 2008. Like he wrote:

I encourage everyone to dive into their archives, online or offline, diaries or blogs or notebooks, and bring back something great to show us. It might sound arrogant to say “this is something I did, and it’s great”, or impossible to say “this is the best of my stuff”, but it doesn’t have to be more than “I did this a while back and I still like it. Check it out.”

So the following posts are probably really bad objectively, but I’m quite fond of them because they’re little pieces of self discovery and I think they give a nice overview of some the concerns this blog deals with.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Thom Yorke – All For the Best

Thom Yorke covers All For the Best, a song by Miracle Legion. The song is part of a tribute compilation called Ciao My Shining Star: The Songs of Mark Mulcahy. Beautiful and moving video.

via Underwire

Tagged , , ,

Man Vs God

Man Vs God

Wall Street Journal’s discussion between Richard Dawkins, leader of the “out of the closet atheist movement” and Karen Armstrong, a religious scholar. They were asked, ”where does evolution leave god?” Generally, their answers where predictable. Dawkins sees no place for god in evolution of course, and Armstrong sees evolution as making god a more transcendent thing. Half theology lesson and half Darwinian evolution lesson. Here’s part of Dawkins answer:

Evolution is God’s redundancy notice, his pink slip. But we have to go further. A complex creative intelligence with nothing to do is not just redundant. A divine designer is all but ruled out by the consideration that he must at least as complex as the entities he was wheeled out to explain. God is not dead. He was never alive in the first place.

via The Hannibal Blog

Tagged , , ,

Rise of the Tablog

Rise of the Tablog

Speaking of blogging, this is simply required reading.

It’s frightfully hard to write a blog without feeling that it must do something: even the most humble blogger is encouraged to create a unique selling point, target a ‘laser-focussed niche’, embrace social media, spawn viral content, track stats, and have a dedicated marketing drive; they must teach and inspire, build ‘authority’, start a ‘conversation’, and foster a ‘community’; they should seek out a purpose, a gameplan, a revenue stream, and an exit strategy.

This socially enforced framework creates problems, not least of which in changing Web writing from an expressive, emotive celebration of free speech to an electronic stocking filler: tabloggers aren’t writing; they’re creating content — content that hopes to satisfy self-inflicted quotas, boost traffic, and burn another post on the digital altar to appease the blods. Tabloggers write from a sense of obligation; a feeling that their content must be regular and — worst of all — useful.

via Kung Fu Grippe

Tagged

The Little Guy and Blogging

The Rise of the Professional Blogger

The subheading of the Atlantic article states: “The blogosphere was supposed to democratize publishing and empower the little guy. Turns out, the big blogs are all run by The Man.” The article then goes on pointing out the fact that the top 50 blogs are basically publishing operations, have stayed there fixed, with very little or zero blogs reaching those slots.

Today, the romantic notion that solitary, untamed bloggers are running the Web is more fantasy than fact—nearly as apocryphal as old myths about stoic Western sheriffs killing 11 outlaws with six bullets.

I concur with this, but I don’t think “the man” beat us because he was necessarily better, but because a lot have given up on this form called blogging and have opted for quicker and simpler publishing, broadcasting, or whatever-you-want-to-call-it forms. They may have taken over the reverse chronological web publishing mode (it’s the most scientific way you can define blogging), but the web in general will always offer the little guy a chance to be heard.

Tagged
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.