Filed under Food for Thought Links

Food For Thought Links

food-for-thoughtGladwell for Dummies

A strong critique to the “Gladwellian” thought.

via

The Chessboard Killer

Oldish GQ article that scared the crap out of me. It profiles Russian serial killer Alexander Pichushkin.

“I thought it was strange that he only wanted to kill people he knew,” she says, sipping instant coffee. “If he had killed people he didn’t know, in another neighborhood, it wouldn’t have been as bad, but he killed people he knew.” Indeed, the Maniac befriended people so he could kill them. Among his favorite books was Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People.

Disturbingly, that last bit makes total sense.

The Vestigial Tale

Boston Globe article on the waning of long form content, or as it’s colloquially known, the TLDR(Too Long, Didn’t Read).

There’s a furious adapt-or-die mentality among media organizations. Researchers say we’re becoming a “society of scanners.” They say the Internet is a “link medium.” We find ourselves abandoning stories in mid-sentence. Newspaper executives have embraced a new format known as “charticles,” which are, in the words of the American Journalism Review, “combinations of text, images and graphics that take the place of a full article.” The Orlando Sentinel, for example, now has a front page crammed with graphics, columnist head-shots, bulletins, story keys, headlines, bumpers, tags, indexes, an advertisement — a cartoon! — and lots of pleas to check the Web site.

via

Tagged , , , , , ,

Food for Thought Links

food-for-thought*Today’s links deal with management. Self management and organization management as well. This was totally coincidental.

The Pmarca guide to Personal Productivity

Jed Christiansen has been posting Marc Andreessen’s archive over at his blog and at his Posterous page. I’m really glad I stumbled upon the above wisdom nugget. Here’s Andreessen on scheduling:

Let’s start with a bang: don’t keep a schedule. He’s crazy, you say! I’m totally serious. If you pull it off — and in many structured jobs, you simply can’t — this simple tip alone can make a huge difference in productivity. By not keeping a schedule, I mean: refuse to commit to meetings, appointments, or activities at any set time in any future day. As a result, you can always work on whatever is most important or most interesting, at any time. Want to spend all day writing a research report? Do it! Want to spend all day coding? Do it! Want to spend all day at the cafe down the street reading a book on personal productivity? Do it! When someone emails or calls to say, “Let’s meet on Tuesday at 3″, the appropriate response is: “I’m not keeping a schedule for 2007, so I can’t commit to that, but give me a call on Tuesday at 2:45 and if I’m available, I’ll meet with you.” Or, if it’s important, say, “You know what, let’s meet right now.”

via


Hating What You Do

Companies should be aware of that there’s such a thing as over-management, specially in these shitty times we’re living in.

SUICIDE, proclaimed Albert Camus in “The Myth of Sisyphus”, is the only serious philosophical problem. In France at the moment it is also a serious management problem. A spate of attempted and successful suicides at France Telecom—many of them explicitly prompted by troubles at work—has sparked a national debate about life in the modern corporation. One man stabbed himself in the middle of a meeting (he survived). A woman leapt from a fourth-floor office window after sending a suicidal e-mail to her father: “I have decided to kill myself tonight…I can’t take the new reorganisation.” In all, 24 of the firm’s employees have taken their own lives since early 2008—and this grisly tally follows similar episodes at other pillars of French industry including Renault, Peugeot and EDF.

via


The Gervais Principle, Or The Office according to the Office

In depth look at how the show The Office is more than just a parody of office culture, but a deep inquiry about the uselessness of corporate management.

The Office is not a random series of cynical gags aimed at momentarily alleviating the existential despair of low-level grunts. It is a fully-realized theory of management that falsifies 83.8% of the business section of the bookstore.

via

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Food for Thought Links

food-for-thoughtIn Praise of Doodling

HiLoBrow on the magical-ness of doodling and its etymological history.

“In its modern sense, doodling is surrealism and abstract expressionism’s dour bachelor uncle — a workaday, intuitive expression and proof of the conviction that the artist is coextensive with nature. And the power of all art, furthermore, is bound up in our empathetic experience as doodlers; great art returns our doodles to us with a kind of alienated majesty. It was Emerson who said this, referring to the works of great thinkers — in whose complex, polished, and ramified ideas we may discern the traces of our own abandoned musings.”

The Whole Point of Capitalism

The Forbe article sort of praises Michael Moore’s new film, Capitalism: A Love Story.  I write “sort of” because I haven’t seen the film yet and it’s not clear what the author agrees with. I suppose this discussion is healthy, but we have to be careful and separate what’s purely ideology (capitalism is fair and egalitarian) from what the economic system actually is.

I think Moore’s a little too flip about how important it is for people to be free to chase their fortunes. Some take Moore’s own financial success as irony. I see it as hopeful. We need more Michael Moores. But we don’t get them in a system where, say, the telecom, television and radio industries are difficult to disrupt because only the largest companies can afford access to a spectrum that’s supposed to be held in the public trust.

via This is Probably an Interesting Blog

Understanding the Anxious Mind

NYT Magazine profiles Jerome Kagan’s research on anxiousness.

The tenuousness of modern life can make anyone feel overwrought. And in societal moments like the one we are in — thousands losing jobs and homes, our futures threatened by everything from diminishing retirement funds to global warming — it often feels as if ours is the Age of Anxiety. But some people, no matter how robust their stock portfolios or how healthy their children, are always mentally preparing for doom. They are just born worriers, their brains forever anticipating the dropping of some dreaded other shoe. For the past 20 years, Kagan and his colleagues have been following hundreds of such people, beginning in infancy, to see what happens to those who start out primed to fret. Now that these infants are young adults, the studies are yielding new information about the anxious brain.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Food For Thought Links

food-for-thoughtQuestioning Accidentalism

Nicholas Carr refutes the idea that progress in media technology is “accidental”.

When you describe an event or a thing as an accident, what you are doing is draining it of all human content. You are saying that human intention and will and desire played no part in its occurrence. A volcano is an accident in human history (if not natural history), and if it’s a big enough one it may well influence the course of that history. But the the book, the printing press, the publishing house, the newspaper, and the newspaper company are not volcanoes. Their development was guided not just by blind circumstance but by human intent and desire. They represent, not just in the abstract but in their concrete forms, something that people wanted and that people consciously brought into being, for human purposes.

Why Are Russians So Good at Chess?

Because they are obsessed with it at a nationalistic level. From the Slate article:

Chess has long been popular in Russia—Czar Ivan IV is thought to have died while playing a match in 1584. After the Bolsheviks took power in 1917, it became a national pastime. Soon after the revolution, Vladimir Lenin’s supreme commander of the Soviet army, Nikolay Krylenko, laid the foundations for state-sponsored chess: He opened chess schools, hosted tournaments, and promoted the game as a vehicle for international dominance. The first state-sponsored chess tournament was held in Moscow in 1921. Six years later, chess prodigy Alexander Alekhine became the first Russian to win a world tournament. By 1934, 500,000 amateur players had registered with the state chess program. When Mikhail Botvinnik won the international title in 1948, he kicked off an era of Soviet domination that extended unbroken—except for a four-year streak by American Bobby Fischer—until the fall of the USSR.

So Who Are the True Elitists?

The author of the article literary claims:

Given two people with comparable levels of intelligence and technical skills, the one with less-reputable external marks of status will be more likely to display outward signs of elitism, arrogance, and snobbery.

via HN

Tagged , , , , ,

Food For Thought Links

food-for-thoughtThe Holy Grail of the Unconscious

The Ny Time Magazine article tells the story about the lost book of Carl Jung, the father of analytical psychology. For almost 100 years, the red leather bound book has been the subject of speculation and controversy. Sarah Corbett writes about the struggle to get it published. Below is a snip of what it’s about:

“The book tells the story of Jung trying to face down his own demons as they emerged from the shadows. The results are humiliating, sometimes unsavory. In it, Jung travels the land of the dead, falls in love with a woman he later realizes is his sister, gets squeezed by a giant serpent and, in one terrifying moment, eats the liver of a little child. (“I swallow with desperate efforts — it is impossible — once again and once again — I almost faint — it is done.”) At one point, even the devil criticizes Jung as hateful.”

I want to read that.

via Give Me Something to Read

Project Gaydar

“You wanna know how I know your gay? You like Coldplay.” That’s a line Paul Rudd says to Seth Rogen in the 40 Year Old Virgin. Well, that man-child joke is soon to become obsolete if this project is proven valid, which I doubt. Two MIT students created a software algorithm that studies a person’s Facebook profile and they claim it can predict if the person is gay.

Using data from the social network Facebook, they made a striking discovery: just by looking at a person’s online friends, they could predict whether the person was gay. They did this with a software program that looked at the gender and sexuality of a person’s friends and, using statistical analysis, made a prediction. The two students had no way of checking all of their predictions, but based on their own knowledge outside the Facebook world, their computer program appeared quite accurate for men, they said. People may be effectively “outing” themselves just by the virtual company they keep.

via Meta Filter

Post-Medium Publishing

Paul Graham on publishing and it’s shift and fight between selling content or selling the medium.

Almost every form of publishing has been organized as if the medium was what they were selling, and the content was irrelevant. Book publishers, for example, set prices based on the cost of producing and distributing books. They treat the words printed in the book the same way a textile manufacturer treats the patterns printed on its fabrics.

via Snarkmarket

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Food for Thought Links

food-for-thoughtThe Case for Working with Your Hands

NyTimes piece by Matthew B. Crawford, author of Shop Class as Soul Craft. Like in his book, the essay deals with how modern America has devalued the manual trades like plumbing, carpentry, and mechanics. He argues that since the switch to “knowledge work”, there’s a mistaken assumption that working with things and working with your hands is for “stupid” people, but it’s far more satisfying intellectually than people are aware of.

The trades suffer from low prestige, and I believe this is based on a simple mistake. Because the work is dirty, many people assume it is also stupid. This is not my experience. I have a small business as a motorcycle mechanic in Richmond, Va., which I started in 2002. I work on Japanese and European motorcycles, mostly older bikes with some “vintage” cachet that makes people willing to spend money on them. I have found the satisfactions of the work to be very much bound up with the intellectual challenges it presents. And yet my decision to go into this line of work is a choice that seems to perplex many people.

Be sure to also check out the excellent book review

Sometimes, The Better You Program, The Worse You Communicate

Really funny and interesting article about how the minds of programmers work. The more clear and rational you are the better you can communicate. That’s true, up to a point. Some programmers take this to heart. To do their work effectively they have to communicate clearly, sequentially, and logical. But with humans you have to do the complete opposite.

The golden rule of programming is D.R.Y. — don’t repeat yourself. This is the heart of effective programming. But this is the opposite of effective communication.

Let me say that again:

The golden rule of programming, DRY, is the opposite of effective communication. 

Say everything once and only once — go ahead — then be amazed as everyone misses your point!

Humans are not machines. Memories made of this gooey, spongy stuff called a brain are nothing like memories made of silicon.

With Humans, nothing sinks in the first time. And furthermore, you may be surprised to hear that NOTHING sinks in the first time.

The Capitalist Manifesto: Greed is Good

Newsweek’s International chief editor Fareed Zakaria on the Recession. His take?:

The global financial system has been crashing more frequently over the past 30 years than in any comparable period in history. On the face of it, this suggests that we’re screwing up, when in fact what is happening is more complex. The problems that have developed over the past decades are not simply the products of failures. They could as easily be described as the products of success.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Food For Thought Links

food-for-thoughtWhy Are People So Stupid: A Deep Philosophical Inquiry

We think that intelligence is what has made us survive and evolve in this world, but stupidity has a lot more to do with it. Our advantage and “top of the food chain” status has been made possible not because of our “logical brain” that plans and formulates theories, but because of  the “dumb brain” that reacts to instincts and emotions. Like the essay mentions, “stupid people breed”. Here’s a snip:

Stupidity does not hamper reproduction! Stupid people breed. Stupidity may in fact help our ability to reproduce quite a bit. Anyone who has ever gotten married, had children and later wondered – why did I do that anyway? Oh yeah, that’s right, I was really stupid – can attest to the helpful effects of stupidity on the mating, dating, and attraction process. Not thinking clearly is very helpful in making the whole mystery of chemical attraction seem worth pursuing.

This essay is long and divided in three parts, so bookmarking is highly suggested. Simply hilarious and genius.

Positively Misguided: The Myths and Mistakes of the Positive Thinking Movement

“Think positive. Look on the brightside. Don’t doubt yourself. Believe in yourself”… if all this stuff is starting to sound like blind optimism, well, it mostly is. The Skeptic Magazine article examines the positive mental attitude(PMA) movement and demonstrates why it has done more harm than good. Here’s one of the reasons why they think so:

The notion that the riddle of success is more easily solved by attitude than aptitude may be one of the more subtly destructive forces in American society. Not only is it a reproach to rational thought, but in a society already veering ominously towards narcissism, this “hyping of hope” also erodes reverence for hard work, patience, scholarship, self-discipline, self-sacrifice, due diligence and the other time-honored components of success.

*Note. The link doesn’t take you exactly to the article. Click the featured article link, or scroll down some.

Big Entertainment Wants to Party Like It’s 1996

Cory Doctorow on how the Government and entertainment industry are secretly making internet regulation laws to combat piracy and copyright infringement. 

The entertainment industry wants to retreat to the comfort of 1996. It was a good year for them. CDs were selling briskly, but no one had figured out how to rip them and turn them into MP3s yet. Music fans were still spending money to buy CD versions of music they owned on LP. DVDs had just been released, and movie fans were spending money to buy DVDs for movies they already owned on VHS.

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Food for Thought Links

food-for-thought*Since this week has been a big Twitter week, todays’ weekend series of Food for Thought Links is dedicated to the little bird.

Twitter dot dash (reissue)

Author Nicholas Carr over at Rough Type reposts his impression of Twitter back in the day. March 18, 2007 to be exact. Here’s a snip:

Narcissism is just the user interface for nihilism, of course, and with artfully kitschy services like Twitter we’re allowed to both indulge our self-absorption and distance ourselves from it by acknowledging, with a coy digital wink, its essential emptiness. I love me! Just kidding!

Via Azspot

Let Them Eat Tweets

To be honest, I’m not exactly sure what’s the take away message of this NYT op-ed. It talks about the theory that poor people are more apt to use services like Twitter and other online social networks. Here’s that idea:

“Connectivity is poverty” was how a friend of mine summarized Sterling’s bold theme. Only the poor — defined broadly as those without better options — are obsessed with their connections. Anyone with a strong soul or a fat wallet turns his ringer off for good and cultivates private gardens that keep the hectic Web far away. The man of leisure, Sterling suggested, savors solitude, or intimacy with friends, presumably surrounded by books and film and paintings and wine and vinyl — original things that stay where they are and cannot be copied and corrupted and shot around the globe with a few clicks of a keyboard.

Not sure about that, and as Rex Sorgatz observed over at Fimoculous, this week with CNN, Ashton Kutcher, and Oprah jumping on the bandwagon demonstrates the complete opposite. It’s still an interesting read nonetheless.

Some Real Rules for Using Twitter

Steve Hodson from WinExtra says “have some fucking fun”. Really great guide with no marketing scheme bull. Here’s him explaining some Twitter fallacies:

Twitter isn’t about how many people you have following you. Even though some would suggest that not having a proportionate number of followers to the number of people you follow I would say screw ‘em. Just because you have decided that it is more important to be following, and learning from people instead of conniving people to follow you doesn’t mean you are a spammer or some Twitter reject.

Tagged , , ,

Food for Thought Links

food-for-thoughtVisions and Revisions

William Zinsser on “writing On Writing Well, and keeping it up to date for 35 years”. He goes through the process of how the book came about and through the reasons behind the revisions. I wrote a review of the book a while ago and I still think it’s required reading for any aspiring writer. Which reminds that I have to give it another read.

Here’s Zinsser on his biggest influence, E.B. White, and The Elements of Style:

The dominant manual at that time was The Elements of Style, by E. B. White and William Strunk Jr., which was E. B. White’s updating of the guide that had most influenced him, written in 1918 by his English professor at Cornell. My problem was that White was the writer who had most influenced me. His was the style—seemingly casual but urbane and wise—that I had long taken as my own model. How could I not agree with everything he said about language and usage in The Elements of Style?He was Goliath standing in my path.

But when I analyzed White’s book, its terrors evaporated. The Elements of Style was essentially a book of pointers and admonitions: Do this, don’t do that. As principles they were invaluable, but they were only principles, existing without context or reality. What his book didn’t teach was how to apply those principles to the various forms that nonfiction writing can take, each with its special requirements: travel writing, science writing, business writing, the interview, memoir, sports, criticism, humor. That’s what I taught in my course, and it’s what I would teach in my book. I wouldn’t compete with The Elements of Style; I would complement it.

The Elements of Style is the Kabbala of writing; On Writing Well is the Bible.

Why Money Messes With Your Mind

While reading this, I kept hearing Frito Pendejo’s voice saying “I like money”. The New Scientist article is about how money has a psychological hold on us and can even be as addictive as drugs for some people. From the article:

Lea and Webley propose that money, like nicotine or cocaine, can activate the brain’s pleasure centres, the neurological pathways that make biologically beneficial activities such as sex feel so rewarding. Of course, money does not physically enter the brain but it might work in a similar way to pornographic text, argue Lea and Webley, which can cause arousal not by giving any biochemical or physiological stimuli, but by acting through the mind and emotions.

Wikipedia: Exploring Fact City

NyTimes piece on Wikipedia as a City analogy.

Like a city, Wikipedia is greater than the sum of its parts; for example, the random encounters there are often more compelling than the articles themselves. The search for information resembles a walk through an overbuilt quarter of an ancient capital. You circle around topics on a path that appears to be shifting. Ultimately the journey ends and you are not sure how you got there.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Food for Thought Links

food-for-thoughtHOWTO: 149 Surprising Ways to Turbocharge Your Blog with Credibility!

The link takes you to 43folders where there’s a podcast with said name. It’s a talk that Merlin Mann and Daring Fireball author John Gruber gave at SXSW Interactive. They basically talk about making and putting things on the internet and how to do it in a way that in the long run, benefits both parties (i.e. you and your audience). Funny, but equally inspiring. It’s a must listen, specially if your drive to make things is something more than making money on the internet. To get into Stephen Covey territory, it’s a “paradigm shift” in the way people usually think about being successful on the web. Gruber has a better grip at what they where trying to get at and he wrote a nice post about it. Here’s a quote:

No one gets into something like this without an obsession, but if your obsession is with the money, and your revenue is directly correlated to page views, then rather than write or produce anything with any actual merit or integrity, you’ll dance like a monkey and split your articles across multiple “pages” and spend more time ginning up sensational Digg-bait headlines than writing the articles themselves. It’s thievery — not of money, but of readers’ attention.

Why Advertising is Failing on the Internet

This is a guest post by Eric Clemons on Techcrunch. It’s an in depth and controversial analysis of not just why internet advertising is “failing”, but why it plainly doesn’t work or isn’t going to keep on working. From the article:

It is frequently argued that the advertising industry will provide sufficient innovation to replace the loss of traditional ads on traditional mass media.  Again, my basic premise rejects this, suggesting that simple commercial messages, pushed through whatever medium, in order to reach a potential customer who is in the middle of doing something else, will fail.  It’s not that we no longer need information to initiate or to complete a transaction; rather, we will no longer need advertising to obtain that information.  We will see the information we want, when we want it, from sources that we trust more than paid advertising.  We will find out what we need to know, when we want to make a commercial transaction of any kind.  The conventional wisdom is that this is exactly what paid search helps us to do, but all too often they are nothing more than a form of misdirection, as I explain further below.  Instead, we will use information that we trust, obtained at the time that we want to see it.

Bolded emphasis mine. [Via]

Shel Holtz Vs Kurt Vonnegut

I found this through a Seth Godin post were he explained The Pillars of Social Media Site Success. It doesn’t take much deep thought that the more these sites satisfy the individuals ego, the more success they have. That’s not surprising. But pretending that online communities can be better and replace their meatspace counterparts is a little crazy, specially when someone decides to Tweet that someone has fainted, instead of calling 911. From the Writing Boots post:

The other reluctance we should all have about Twitter, even as we grudgingly accept its occasional social utility, is the Kurt Vonnegut Rule of Farting Around. “Electronic communities build nothing,” my favorite humanist wrote near the end of his life. “You wind up with nothing. We are dancing animals. How beautiful it is to get up and go out and do something. We are here on earth to fart around. Don’t let anybody tell you different.” *

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.