Tagged with Technology

Food For Thought Links

food-for-thoughtQuestioning Accidentalism

Nicholas Carr refutes the idea that progress in media technology is “accidental”.

When you describe an event or a thing as an accident, what you are doing is draining it of all human content. You are saying that human intention and will and desire played no part in its occurrence. A volcano is an accident in human history (if not natural history), and if it’s a big enough one it may well influence the course of that history. But the the book, the printing press, the publishing house, the newspaper, and the newspaper company are not volcanoes. Their development was guided not just by blind circumstance but by human intent and desire. They represent, not just in the abstract but in their concrete forms, something that people wanted and that people consciously brought into being, for human purposes.

Why Are Russians So Good at Chess?

Because they are obsessed with it at a nationalistic level. From the Slate article:

Chess has long been popular in Russia—Czar Ivan IV is thought to have died while playing a match in 1584. After the Bolsheviks took power in 1917, it became a national pastime. Soon after the revolution, Vladimir Lenin’s supreme commander of the Soviet army, Nikolay Krylenko, laid the foundations for state-sponsored chess: He opened chess schools, hosted tournaments, and promoted the game as a vehicle for international dominance. The first state-sponsored chess tournament was held in Moscow in 1921. Six years later, chess prodigy Alexander Alekhine became the first Russian to win a world tournament. By 1934, 500,000 amateur players had registered with the state chess program. When Mikhail Botvinnik won the international title in 1948, he kicked off an era of Soviet domination that extended unbroken—except for a four-year streak by American Bobby Fischer—until the fall of the USSR.

So Who Are the True Elitists?

The author of the article literary claims:

Given two people with comparable levels of intelligence and technical skills, the one with less-reputable external marks of status will be more likely to display outward signs of elitism, arrogance, and snobbery.

via HN

Tagged , , , , ,

Is The Internet Making Us _________?

Is The Internet Melting Our Brains?

Salon had an interview with Dennis Baron, author of A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution. He discusses how every new technological medium has had it’s detractors. From the written text, to the telegraph, to the printing press; they all had strong contrarians that saw these technologies as “the end of civilization as we know it”. Check out Plato on written words:

I start with Plato’s critique of writing where he says that if we depend on writing, we will lose the ability to remember things. Our memory will become weak. And he also criticizes writing because the written text is not interactive in the way spoken communication is. He also says that written words are essentially shadows of the things they represent. They’re not the thing itself. Of course we remember all this because Plato wrote it down — the ultimate irony.

via BB

Tagged , , , , ,

Pixelated Brains and New Media

Popmatters has been running a feature called Pixalated Brains and New Media which are a series of articles that deal with the web, reading, our short attention spans, online social networking, and many other digital concerns, worries, hopes, and dreams. I started with Scratching the Surface: Your Brain on the Internet via Metafilter. Here’s a snip to the intro of the series:

There’s a great deal of concerned talk, talk, talk out there about our shortening attention span, and it seems our demise (because let’s be frank – the overall tone is that whatever is happening to us is bad for the species) is all thanks to the advent of New Media. You know, all those pixel bits of blog entries, TV news quips shouting at us between blaring 30-second commercials, three-line gossipy blips under BIG PICTURES in glossy mags, proper grammar and punctuation lost to text messaging, sound bytes bouncing along the airwaves at varying decibels …  Via these methods we nibble from an array of fast foods for thought, taking from what’s presented that which we like, eschewing the rest and flitting off, or perhaps Twittering off, to the next pretty shiny thing.

Tagged , , , , , ,

The Cross-Subsidized Free Lunch

It Feels A Little Like Free

There’s been a lot of free talk provoked by Chris Anderson’s book, Free: The Future of Radical Price. Cory Doctorow’s critique of the book is very spot on when he mentions that some things are just “truly free” and can exist outside of a “marketplace”. That’s why Anderson fumbles a lot between the idea of free and cross-subsidized methods. But the above link to the Snarkmarket post takes the cake in explaining and understanding what Anderson is trying to explain, or sell.

When the idea of free really works, it makes us forget that it ever even cost anything at all. Reading web pages is free – once you count the money you pay for internet access. Between my phone and my house, I pay more for internet access per month than I do books – and I read a lot. Add on to that all of the ways my free behavior is paid for with information from or attention paid by me, and a ruthless calculus would determine that the internet is expensive as hell.

Almost all free things are cross-subsidized in some ways. But if the cross-subsidy is obvious – “Free phone with a two-year plan worth at least…” – then free fails. If your website suddenly has a glaring and obnoxious banner ad, then it doesn’t matter if it is as free today as it was yesterday. It doesn’t feel free anymore.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

I Click, Therefore I Am

From Thinkers to Clickers: The World Wide Web and the Transformation of the Essence of Being Human

Essay about all things clicking and how it has become into a human need like breathing, eating, and looking for shelter.

As they click on one hyperlink after another, they often forget the initial question to which they were trying to find an answer. This is because the Web offers many distractions to its users in the form of ever changing content, links that are either obsolete or lead to completely new and different Web sites, and pop-ups and banners that advertise goods and services. Often times, as people aimlessly click their way through cyberspace, hyperclick hysteria sets in, and people lose their bearings in cyberspace and have to click their way back to more familiar cyber territories. 

Bolded to highlight that while I don’t think the above link is obsolete, the essay was written in 2003. So there you go.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Thought Leader Battle Royal – Round 3

Malcolm is Wrong

In a surprising move, bald marketing guru Seth Godin tagged Anderson, and betrayed his intellectual buddy. The drama ensues.

Conde Nast (publisher of the Wired (Chris’s magazine) and yes, theNew Yorker (Malcolm’s magazine)),  is going to go out of business long before you get sick, never mind die. So will newspapers printed on paper. They’re going to disappear before you do. I’m not wishing for this to happen, but by refusing to build new digital assets that matter, traditional publishers are forfeiting their future.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

In The Future We Won’t Need Bodies

Get Smarter

Atlantic article about the future of how our intelligence will keep on expanding using exocortical technology (geeky way of saying gadgets and computers), artificial intelligence, etc. It’s an optimistic article about the future in a very Singularity/Ray Kurzweil type of way. And dammit, it even mentions Twitter:

As processor power increases, tools like Twitter may be able to draw on the complex simulations and massive data sets that have unleashed a revolution in science. They could become individualized systems that augment our capacity for planning and foresight, letting us play “what-if” with our life choices: where to live, what to study, maybe even where to go for dinner. Initially crude and clumsy, such a system would get better with more data and more experience; just as important, we’d get better at asking questions. These systems, perhaps linked to the cameras and microphones in our mobile devices, would eventually be able to pay attention to what we’re doing, and to our habits and language quirks, and learn to interpret our sometimes ambiguous desires. With enough time and complexity, they would be able to make useful suggestions without explicit prompting.

We are in the utopian wave of a future vision. Which brings me to ask this question: Why do we only understand how the future would look like in utopian/dystopian views? I know it’s science fiction influencing reality and vice versa, but we can’t just seem to look at the future as just a little a better or a little worse.

Tagged , , ,

Thought Leader Battle Royal

Price to Sell: Is Free the Future?

Malcolm Gladwell’s latest New Yorker article takes on Chris Anderson’s Free: The Future of Radical Price. As you would assume, Gladwell is very skeptical about the whole idea of “free” as a business model. Here’s Gladwell’s counter argument on Anderson’s idea about journalism turning into an “avocation”:

His advice is pithy, his tone uncompromising, and his subject matter perfectly timed for a moment when old-line content providers are desperate for answers. That said, it is not entirely clear what distinction is being marked between “paying people to get other people to write” and paying people to write. If you can afford to pay someone to get other people to write, why can’t you pay people to write? It would be nice to know, as well, just how a business goes about reorganizing itself around getting people to work for “non-monetary rewards.” Does he mean that the New York Times should be staffed by volunteers, like Meals on Wheels? 

Tagged , , , , ,

The Changing Asian Beauty Aesthetic

japeneserobotfaces

The Changing Asian Beauty Aesthetic

Disturbing but equally interesting post filled with pics about how the pressure in Asian countries for women to look more “western” has influenced even how female robots look.

I used to quip that Korean women actors were starting to look positively “robotic” – but now, even the robots are looking…umm…absolutely…uhh…as humanistically artificially and Eurocentrically enhanced as the people? You’d think they’d get a robot right the first time. After all, we made it.

via HN

Tagged , , , ,

Who Was the First Blogger?

Scott Rosenberg, author of the new book Say Everything, goes on a quest to track down the first blogger. Anil Dash says that tracking down the first blogger is like tracking down who started hip-hop. We will never really know and by this point it doesn’t really matter. The video however is a great history class on the roots of blogging and the first weblog pioneers.

via Waxy

Tagged , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.